StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Welfare Spending in the USA - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Welfare Spending in the USA " tells that welfare spending in the USA has been realizing negative effects on the economic standing of American society as a whole, more specifically in terms of long-term growth in poverty rates and high levels of unemployment…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.1% of users find it useful
Welfare Spending in the USA
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Welfare Spending in the USA"

?The Negative Impact of Increasing Welfare Spending Welfare spending in the USA has been realizing negative effects on the economic standing of American society as a whole, more specifically in terms of long term growth in poverty rates and high levels of unemployment. As of the report for fiscal year 2011, the total funds spent for the “federal welfare programs amounted to roughly $ 1.03 trillion. . . This excludes entitlement programs to which people contribute (e.g. Social Security and Medicare)”, according to Sessions, J. (2011, p.1). SS expenditures in 2011 was $725 billion while for Medicare, it amounted to $ 480 billion. The analytical findings of Brady, D.( 2009, p.81) stated that “As countries devote a larger share of their economy to welfare, poverty declines steeply.” This happened to Scandinavia, Finland, and Sweden, and European continental countries like Netherlands and Belgium. USA was identified to have high poverty and low welfare expenses. He also made clear that poverty is not necessarily increased by higher welfare generosity.(p.84) and further says that it benefits all rather than just “the elderly or men” (p.87). The 5 features of welfare state were historically proven to reduce poverty through greater generosity with (1) social welfare expenditures, (2)expenditures for public health, (3) social security, (4)government expenditures, and (5) “decommodification” (p.91). Brady, D. (p.92) also contends that public employment is less effective than welfare state generosity as a strategy to combat poverty regardless of the regime. The basis of his findings was a poverty headcount in different countries over 20 years from 1974 to the year 2000, and the different welfare state levels of generosity of European and American countries. In another study by Lowry, R.C. (2005, p. 2), the empirical evidence gathered from 1990 to 2000 arrived at the conclusion that in the USA, “public welfare spending by state and local government has a positive effect on private sector employment”. It was because private firms are part of those who deliver the welfare services made possible by government funding. “More public welfare spending is associated with higher private sector employment. . (p.3).” However, statistics have changed from 2000 to 2011. See Chart 1 – Poverty Rate in the USA from 1990 to 2011. And the 2012 poverty rate in USA has continued to prove the negative long term impact of rising welfare spending. Chart 1 While it is true that poverty level expressed in percentage of population declined from 1993 to 2000 in the USA, it showed a general rise from 2000 to 2011. As of September 2012, the USA poverty level was at 15% according to the Census Bureau (Weise, K. 2012). This refers to 46.2 million people living in poverty within the USA alone. In the same US Census Bureau report cited by Bloomberg, the other negative impact included a 1.7 % decline in the “median real household income” and a rise in the income inequality by 1.6%. That is, the rich became richer while the middle class earned less. (US Census Bureau1 2012) Statistics showed that from the comparable years 2000 to 2012, the total welfare spending inclusive of medical services was generally increasing. Chart 2 – Welfare Including Healthcare tells this story in the Appendix section of this paper. The increases were expressed in terms of percentage of GDP which happens to be increasing every year. In absolute figures, welfare spending definitely increased annually. Appendix section’s Chart 3 shows data in terms of increasing $ billions worth of welfare spending. Yet poverty level increased in the same period. This proves a negative long term effect of encouraging people in America to become dependent on welfare spending until more and more get into the habit of not working or not striving to be productive and self-reliant via entrepreneurship with small businesses. And so while it is true that a growing welfare spending lowered the poverty level in the USA from 1993 to 2000, apparently as a result of private enterprises which delivered the welfare services and generated immediate employment for the purpose of doing so, in the long term, statistics reveal the negative impact of rising poverty level after the private enterprises were already in place for welfare services to be given to the public. Increasing welfare expenditures no longer stopped the growth in poverty level starting year 2000. And the other negative impact wherein the rich got richer while the middle class earned less worsened the economic plight of American society in spite of all the increases in welfare spending for the needy. An extract of the absolute dollar figures worth of welfare spending is shown in Table 1 – Welfare Spending Data in Billions of Dollars 1990 – 2015. Please see Appendix section’s Table 1. Corresponding to the same years discussed, 1990 to the present, an inspection of the unemployment rates over the years showed the pattern of decline in unemployment rate from 1993 to 2000, followed by a cycle of rising average unemployment rate per month from 2000 to the present. See Appendix section’s Chart 4 – Statistics of Unemployment Rates, 1990 - 2012. The details of absolute figures in terms of unemployment rate are shown in Appendix section’s Table 2 – Data of Unemployment Rates, 1990 - 2012. It should be reiterated that welfare spending did not stop growing (on the average). Yet the unemployment rate grew. Although the fault may not be fully attributed to the idea of perpetually increasing the welfare spending, it can be logically stated that increasing the welfare spending does not necessarily alleviate high poverty rate and does not assure American society of lower unemployment rate in the long run. Providing for the needs of less privileged is good only up to a certain extent. It will provide for immediate relief in times when people cannot find income earning jobs. But to say that spending for growing need for welfare (simply because the people cannot find sources of income) will be a solution to facilitate economic growth and rise in the employment opportunities is a fallacy. The US Small Business Administration boasts of 49% increase in small businesses since 1982, adding 8 million new jobs, while big businesses cut down employment by 4 million since 1990 (US SBA, 2013). This is nothing to be happy about. Population used to be only 226,646,000 in 1980 (US Census Bureau2, 2012 p.11). Today, US population is somewhere in the vicinity of 315,000,000 or an increase of more than 88 million. Can you imagine what people at the US Small Business Association meant by an increase in job opportunities of only 8 million since 1982? What about the 80,000,000 additional US population? What will be their jobs? If government keeps increasing welfare spending at the expense of job opportunities, more and more people will depend on welfare spending. There will be definite growth in unemployment rates precisely because the funds don’t go for creation of new businesses and new jobs. The providers of welfare services already exist. They can only add to their income by serving more dependents, but not add more employment. And people cannot be blamed for being jobless and for becoming more dependent. They were “packaged” to be jobless by the mere act of not creating employment opportunities, and by providing just the option of depending on welfare benefits in order to survive. Or at least it appears that US government has been focusing on “dole-outs” in the form of welfare benefits, while there has been no concrete and clear set of actions to ensure the employment of millions who are unemployed. But don’t you worry, says Uncle Sam. There’s more welfare spending on the way. There were news reports about abusing the availability of welfare spending. One such article came from The Washington Times. Dinan, S. (2012) reported: “The conservative Heritage Foundation said roughly 100 mmillion Americans get benefits from at least one low-income assistance program each month, with the average benefit coming to around $ 9,000. The think thank estimates that if welfare spending were transferred as straight cash instead, it would be five times more than needed to lift every American family above the poverty line. . .” It should be mentioned, however, that many such contentions came out right before the USA presidential campaign. If there is a grain of truth to such articles, audit reports by the government should have verified and confirmed or disproved the report. In other words, as of the present, such claims are at best subject to further investigation. For now, in the absence of facts to support accusations, the information is baseless. The government has websites such as http://www.mcss.gov.on.ca/en/mcss/programs/social/fraud.aspx which can be accessed anytime to report any suspicion of fraud. Yet there has been no official government report of massive fraud or abuse in the use of welfare funds. This side of the negative impact does not appear to be valid. Assuming there are abuses, the mere fact that no officially released information about improper use of welfare funds, such incidents must be negligible or isolated cases only. What will need immediate attention is the long-term negative impact supported statistically by this paper. Facts speak loud and clear. Works Cited Brady, David. Rich Democracies, Poor People: How Politics Explain Poverty. UK: Oxford University Press, August 13, 2009. Dinan, Stephen. Welfare Spending Jumps 32% During Obama’s Presidency. The Washington Post, October 18, 2012. Viewed January 8, 2013 @ http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/18/welfare-spending-jumps-32-percent-four-years/?page=all Lowry, Robert C. The Effects of Public Welfare Spending and Federal Welfare Reform on Private Social Services Employment in American States. Iowa State University, March 2, 2005. Viewed January 7, 2012 @ http://courses.gov.harvard.edu/gov3009/spring05/lowry.pdf Sessions, Jeff. CRS Report: Welfare Spending The Largest Item in the Federal Budget. United States Senate Budget Committee, 2011. Viewed January 6, 2013 @ http://budget.senate.gov/republican/public/index.cfm/files/serve/?File_id=34919307-6286-47ab-b114-2fd5bcedfeb5 US Census Bureau1. Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2011. US Department of Commerce US Census Newsroom, September 12, 2012. CB12-172. Viewed January 7, 2013 @ http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/income_wealth/cb12-172.html US Census Bureau2. Statistical Abstract of the United States: Section 1. Population. Viewed January 7, 2013 @ http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/12statab/pop.pdf US SBA. Small Business Trends. US Small Business Administration, 2013. Viewed January 7, 2013 @ http://www.sba.gov/content/small-business-trends . Weiss, Karen. Record U.S. Poverty Rate Holds As Inequality Grows. Boomberg Businessweek: Global Economics, September 12, 2012. Viewed January 7, 2013 @ http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-09-12/record-u-dot-s-dot-poverty-rate-holds-as-inequality-grows Appendix Chart 2 (Source: Chantrill, Christopher. Charts and Graphs: Welfare Including Healthcare Spending Chart. Viewed January 7, 2013 @ http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/spending_chart_1902_2015USp_13s1li011lcn_40t17t13t_Welfare_Including_Healthcare ) Chart 3 (Source: Chantrill, Christopher. Charts and Graphs: Welfare Including Healthcare Spending Chart. Viewed January 7, 2013 @ http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/spending_chart_1902_2015USb_13s1li011lcn_40t17t13t_Welfare_Including_Healthcare ) Table1 -Welfare Spending Data in Billions of Dollars 1990 – 2015 (Source: Bureau of Labor and Statistics. Viewed January 7, 2013 @ http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet ) Chart 4 – Statistics of Unemployment Rates, 1990 to 2012 (Source: Bureau of Labor and Statistics. Viewed January 7, 2013 @ http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet ) Table 2 – Data of Unemployment Rates, 1990 – 2012 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The Negative Effects of Welfare Spending in America Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/sociology/1466044-the-negative-effects-of-welfare-spending-in
(The Negative Effects of Welfare Spending in America Research Paper)
https://studentshare.org/sociology/1466044-the-negative-effects-of-welfare-spending-in.
“The Negative Effects of Welfare Spending in America Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1466044-the-negative-effects-of-welfare-spending-in.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Welfare Spending in the USA

Fixing the National Debt

Only the latter is applicable to the current debt problem in the usa since the government's high debt disqualifies it from obtaining finance from foreign governments.... It is not easy to reduce spending in health but with the crisis situation of the economy, this may be one of the most viable options in saving America's financial sector.... Final draft Title: Fixing usa's Public Debt Name: Professor: Institution: Course: Date: The United States of America has a public debt valued slightly above 15 trillion dollars (Brillig....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Unemployment In USA

Unemployment is an ever present problem all over the world, and the usa has not been left behind.... Unemployment in USA Unemployment is an ever present problem all over the world, and the usa has not been left behind.... Most countries with the usa being one of them are capable of undertaking other approaches in aiding the reduction of their unemployment levels (Richard & Lowell 31).... Unfortunately, the latest elixir builds on the unstable platform of job creation by means of taxation, spending, as well as regulation (Ryan 55)....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families

They also aimed at reducing federal spending on financial aid to the needy families with dependent children.... This led to the introduction of welfare-work programs.... These programs were found to have highly increased employment rates and reducing welfare rolls.... However, the programs had very minimal effect on the income of former welfare recipients.... The government then made the decision to turn welfare into a transitional system....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Our Unconstitutional Congress by Stephen Moore

Our Unconstitutional Congress - Congress spending money on programs not stated in the Constitution" is an article by Stephen Moore that criticizes the way Congress appropriates federal funds.... Today however, federal budget amounts to billions of dollars and it subsidizes on almost everything that you can think of claiming that it is for the 'general welfare.... All these led to the over-extension of the general welfare clause - Congress can just allot on anything as long as it alleges that it is for the 'general welfare'....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Negative Effects of Welfare Spending in America

"The Negative Impact of Increasing Welfare Spending" paper states that Welfare Spending in the USA has been realizing negative effects on the economic standing of American society as a whole, more specifically in terms of long term growth in poverty rates and high levels of unemployment.... 2), the empirical evidence gathered from 1990 to 2000 arrived at the conclusion that in the usa, “public welfare spending by state and local government has a positive effect on private sector employment”....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Defining Social Welfare Policy

This paper "Defining Social welfare Policy" focuses on the fact that social welfare is a broad concept incorporating various aspects of assistance provided by the state for its residents in order to improve their quality of life and increase their well-being.... nbsp;… Social welfare may refer to the well-being of the society as a whole (or the society of a certain state) relating to the quality of life and numerous factors affecting it: these can include the environment quality, crime and drug abuse rates, spiritual life and, of course, level of social services availability and those provided by the state....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Social Welfare Services in Britain - Barnardo's

This study "Social welfare Services in Britain – Barnardo's" is centered on social welfare services and its impact on the surrounding environment as well as the impact of organizational arrangements and management-driven change on experience and delivery of social welfare services.... hellip; Barnardo's has been chosen as a social welfare organization that will be critically analyzed to identify their service delivery.... Social welfare sector is a particular segment which aims towards developing a better society....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Welfare Reform

In the year 1996, President Clinton converted welfare reform to become law in the usa, significantly changing the program.... Provision of welfare benefits has remained contentious all the way through the history of the usa.... The writer of the paper “welfare Reform” states that if the aim is to reduce the level of poverty, the essential thing that the government can do is to help working families with low-income.... hellip; welfare reform aims at transforming the social welfare policy of the federal government, which moved accountability to the states and eliminated benefits that were initially there....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us