StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Rationalism And Empiricism - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This paper "Rationalism And Empiricism" will be to gather a deeper understanding in relation to the concerned concepts i.e. prior and the posteriori knowledge. In addition, the essay aims to identify the implications of both the knowledge processes in the physical world…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.3% of users find it useful
Rationalism And Empiricism
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Rationalism And Empiricism"

Rationalism And EmpiricismTHESIS STATEMENTThe main aim of the essay will be to gather a deeper understanding in relation to the concerned concepts i.e. prior and the posteriori knowledge. In addition, the essay aims to identify the implications of both the knowledge processes in the physical world. ARGUMENTS RELATED TO THE DISCUSSIONIn order to render an in-depth argumentative perspective pertaining to the terms prior and Posteriori knowledge along with epistemology, different viewpoints will be studied.

The terms prior and posteriori are essentially used in the field of philosophy. These concepts are a fundamental part of knowledge that shares different meanings (Lawhead 1-80).A Priori knowledge is a process of gathering knowledge by way of performing those activities that may relate to gathering information from the physical world. However, it has been argued that it does not involve any scientific methods or practical experiences in this system (Lawhead 1-80). Posteriori knowledge can be understood as a process of congregating knowledge which is attained by years of experience (Lawhead 1-80).

This category of knowledge can be argued to develop over a period from a person’s interactions with his/her surroundings. Epistemology is a branch of philosophy that primarily deals with the fundamentals along with the possibility and nature related to knowledge. Epistemology is also called ‘theory of knowledge’. This concept predominantly deals with the basic fundamentals regarding knowledge and the principles that are needed to be applied for gaining knowledge (Lawhead 1-80). All the theories evaluated in this particular study reflect a great deal of plausibility because the determined theories have depicted a significant extent of relevance in three particular fields i.e. scientific studies, knowledge gathering process and psychology that primarily involve human behavior.

In terms of one of the crucial strengths of the theories, it can be said that these theories have facilitated to provide a better understanding in relation to the importance of the concepts of rationalism and empiricism, posteriori knowledge, the priori knowledge, and epistemology. Moreover, the theories have helped in understanding the assorted importance of knowledge and the various processes through which it can be gained (Lawhead 1-80). The various aspects of knowledge that have been studied seem to reflect a rational and logical understanding in relation to the knowledge gathering process as well as modern psychology.

It can be determined and argued that the concepts have a strong relationship with the scientific theories as well. All the theories thus provide a sound outlook (Lawhead 1-65). COUNTER ARGUMENTS Considering the evidence gathered, it can be counter-argued that the specific concepts i.e. rationalism and empiricism have certain weaknesses apart from significances. It is observed that empiricism can be a manipulated process owing to the involvement of human beings. Conversely, the complexity associated with innate knowledge at times makes rationalism process difficult to fathom (Lawhead 1-65).

Rationalism process is considered to be little complex as compared to empiricism as it involves one more entity i.e. innate knowledge, however, Empiricism is considered to be a simpler process as compared to rationalism. In relation to creativity, rationalism involves creative processes which trigger innovative working. In empiricism, creative processes are not followed. Rationalism process does not involve any kind of manipulations pertaining to the human being which is a very positive aspect but empiricism process involves humans and their involvement is essentially guided and even manipulated in this process.

Rationalism process does not seem to comply with the functions of scientific techniques and advancements whereas the empiricism process largely deals with the functions of scientific advancements. From the above distinctions, it can be evaluated that both empiricism and rationalism have their own individual benefits and both these concepts can be widely utilized in the field of knowledge (Lawhead 1-80). On the other hand, there are various philosophers who have utilized most of the propositions i.e. posteriori knowledge, the priori knowledge, rationalism and empiricism and epistemology in their experiments.

For example, both posteriori knowledge and prior knowledge are used by philosophers to study the various fields of philosophy as both these terms are philosophical concepts (Lawhead 1-80). In addition, the concept of epistemology is utilized by the philosophers to a greater degree. In fact, this particular concept was used by a renowned Scottish philosopher named James Frederick. Rationalism and empiricism are also used by philosophers as these studies primarily deal with various functions and aspects that involve scientific involvements as well as human psychology (Lawhead 1-65).

All the theories i.e. posteriori knowledge, the prior knowledge, rationalism and empiricism along with epistemology have key foundational principles that principally aim at one common objective i.e. gaining true and relevant knowledge. The basic foundational principles also aim at serving the goal of acquiring knowledge to provide help in the field of psychological as well as scientific studies. Thus, these theories can be considered to be very important. These theories also have important features that mainly comprise all those aspects that can be utilized in the process of gathering knowledge.

All these concepts are given due importance as these are required at almost every level of knowledge gathering process (Lawhead 1-80). Works CitedLawhead, William. The Philosophical Journey: An Interactive Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2010. Print. Lawhead, William F. The Modern Voyage. United States: Cengage Learning, 2001. Print.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Rationalism And Empiricism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 9”, n.d.)
Rationalism And Empiricism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 9. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1485272-essay
(Rationalism And Empiricism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words - 9)
Rationalism And Empiricism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words - 9. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1485272-essay.
“Rationalism And Empiricism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words - 9”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1485272-essay.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Rationalism And Empiricism

Introduction to philosophy

The two are modern philosophers and their ideas lay a foundation to much human thought and examine the modern thought as they have developed a unique philosophy that extends to both Rationalism And Empiricism worlds.... Examining both Hume and Descartes contributions to philosophy shows their critical contribution to the foundation of Kant and thus the basis that united Rationalism And Empiricism.... He started by arguing for the empiricism significance, the idea that peoples' knowledge is anchored on their experiences and he employed this strategy to analyze various philosophical concepts....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

What Are the Important Differences between Rationalists and Empiricists

Thus, both Rationalism And Empiricism are connected with knowledge.... One of the major distinctions between Rationalism And Empiricism is their attitude towards intuition.... Although Immanuel Kant managed to join the both schools and gave birth to so-called rational empiricism, the differences between schools are important as they demonstrate the way one is able to get information and knowledge.... This statement demonstrates that for Asimov it was better and more convenient to use rationalism than empiricism....
2 Pages (500 words) Term Paper

Rationalism and Empiricism and Kants assessment of the problem of knowledge

I believe empiricism, has the best account of what Kant would term ‘synthetic a priori judgments' because raw data that stems from the fundamental objectives supports this school of thought.... mpiricism and rationalism On the one hand, rationalists have suggested that the very basic beginning of knowledge is not the individual senses but rationale.... rationalism is based on the fact that without earlier classes, and principles reinforced by reason forms the basis of the organization and understanding of human sense....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

In two paragraphs, compare and contrast rationalism and empiricism

The belief is that it is possible to access the inner recesses of knowledge only if the Rationalism And Empiricism Rationalism adopts the position that knowledge is innate and a priori.... n the other hand, empiricism is the epistemological school of thought that argues that all knowledge comes from the senses.... empiricism argues in favor of sense experience as the fundamental basis of all knowledge (Maritain 26)....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Major Questions in Philosophy

Epistemology: Traditionally, Rationalism And Empiricism have been the normal ways that philosophy attempts to answer the question, what do I know and how do I know it?... Of both Rationalism And Empiricism, which of the two theories better explains human… Why?...
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Understanding Philosophy from the Various Philosophical Topics

Traditionally, Rationalism And Empiricism have been the normal ways that philosophy attempts to answer the question, “what do I know?... However, both Rationalism And Empiricism theories manifest different strengths and weaknesses in trying to explain human knowledge.... Indeed, while rationalism proposes that we gain knowledge through reasoning, empiricism on the other hand proposes that we gain knowledge through sensory experience (Markie Web)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

Does Kant Adequately Address the Problems Evident in the Controversy between Empiricism and Rationalism

hellip; As the paper outlines, emerges between Rationalism And Empiricism is the level in which we are dependent on sense experience in order for us to gain and acquire knowledge.... This paper declares that in the study of philosophical Epistemology, we normally ask ourselves what we know, what we are sure of and how we can go beyond our mere opinions on real knowledge....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

What Are Rationalism and Empiricism

… The paper "What Are Rationalism And Empiricism: Descartes and Hume" is a great example of a philosophy assignment.... The paper "What Are Rationalism And Empiricism: Descartes and Hume" is a great example of a philosophy assignment.... empiricism after Hume's philosophy, however, requires an a posteriori knowledge apart from analytical endeavor for such theory posits that matters of fact in the world may only be ascertained by perceiving through the senses....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us