StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Analysis of GATTACA Film by Andrew Nicol and Ethics Poem by Pastan - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
"Analysis of GATTACA Film by Andrew Nicol and Ethics Poem by Pastan" paper focuses on film in which the state is driven by a determinism based on genetics and on the poem which defines a situation in which a person must choose between saving a classic painting and another, older human being…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92% of users find it useful
Analysis of GATTACA Film by Andrew Nicol and Ethics Poem by Pastan
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Analysis of GATTACA Film by Andrew Nicol and Ethics Poem by Pastan"

?First Prompt In the film GATTACA, the is driven by a determinism that is based on genetics. Humans are expected to take a specific role in society based on their genetic profiles. The state has decided that genetics make some people better and more capable than others, and social roles are assigned on this basis. There is an implied contract that everyone will accept his or her role and fall into place. The implied contract is similar to that described by Socrates in Plato’s Crito, which is defined as an acceptance of the definition of justice that state has ordered, characterized by the subject’s willingness to remain in the state. Specifically, Socrates writes the following: [H]e who has experience of the manner in which we order justice and administer the State, and still remains, has entered into an implied contract that he will do as we command him. He claims that those who do not obey commands are unjust because they have accepted parental training and education from the state. If they fail to convince the state otherwise, disobedience itself is a kind of crime against the state. Taking this definition on its surface, the character of Vincent Anton Freeman in GATTACA can be shown to violate his contract with the state by trying to rise above his genetically prescribed circumstances. There are many different examples available to show that Vincent refuses to accept his lot in the society of GATTACA. Three such examples will be shown here. First, from his early childhood, Vincent competes against his brother Anton in swimming contests. They swim out to sea and see which one gives up first and swims back. In these early contests, Vincent loses to his brother due to his brother’s superior genetic make-up. However, he continues trying to beat his brother rather than accepting this outcome. In the end, he learns to beat his brother by using all his strength to swim out, not saving anything for the swim back. In this example, he learns that his will can overcome his genetic destiny. Exercising this, he violates his supposed understanding with the state. Second, Vincent decides he wants to become an elite astronaut. In this choice, he also violates his implied contract, which should require him to accept a menial job not afforded those without superior genetics. In the mere decision to attempt to become more than is available to him, Vincent goes against the deterministic direction the state tells him he should accept. While one could make the argument that by attempting to leave earth and go to the stars, Vincent is in fact “leaving” the state, the fact that he uses state space programs in order to achieve his dreams of becoming more indicates that he has accepted the state’s material conditions without accepting its moral dictates. Third, and finally, the fact that Vincent uses deception to achieve his dream of becoming an astronaut shows that he violates his contract. He steals DNA from a person with a “superior” profile and uses this to impersonate a different identity. He even undergoes surgery to make himself taller, so that he won’t be detected. In doing this, he shows that, on one hand, he is willing to live within the state’s expectations, but on the other he does not accept its ultimate ordering of justice. He deceives the state while accepting the benefits that it affords him as he lives under that deception. GATTACA, in the end, poses questions about the justice of a state that is formed on genetic determinism. However, it is also an example of a citizen acting within such a state in a way that is, contractually speaking, unjust. By using the state for his own private ends, Vincent can be said to be unjust, in view of Socrates’ definition. The fact that we pull for him forces us to ask questions about this social contract and about the nature of justice generally. Second Prompt In her poem, “Ethics” Linda Pastan defines a situation in which a person must choose between saving a classic painting and another, older human being. She considers this question in light of her role as a young woman, only to reconsider it later by placing herself in the role of the older woman who would be saved. In doing so, she states a kind of summary of moral relativism. Would her decision be different if the person to be saved were known or unknown to her? Alternatively, would it matter if the painting were one she liked or disliked? If we take as a fundamental assumption that life is sacred, we may wish to define such a situation as one in which the person should always be saved. However, in a scenario in which I was faced with such a decision, to save, for example an old man at the end of his life or the original (and only existing version) of the Mona Lisa, the decision would be difficult. First, there is the matter that the painting has inspired great thought and humanity throughout centuries. It has inspired millions and is culturally important, if only as a historical record of advances in art. Second, there is the matter that the person’s life is at stake and we have defined the fundamental guiding principle in such a way that life is sacred. If I were given to moral absolutism, the decision would be simple. Even if my neighbor encouraged me to take the painting, I would be compelled by the moral directive to take the man first. There is no need to weigh the value of his life or the connection or empathy I may or may not have with him. Life is sacred. That is all I need to know. However, if I were given to moral relativism, I would have to weigh, and quickly, the decision based on a number of factors. First, does the value of the man’s life and the expectancy for his future seem enough to risk losing a classic symbol of humanism and a work of recognized genius? Second, does the encouragement of my neighbor to take the painting weigh in such a manner to compel me to abandon a fellow human in distress? Many other considerations also must be weighed. Would I want to be saved in his place? Would it matter if he wanted to be saved or not? Would it matter if I knew him or not? Such questions are important in the universe of moral relativism because they present various forms of balancing that must be done against generally conceived principles before an action can be taken. Moral relativism asks me to act in such a way that my principles align generally with the conditions in which I find myself. I appreciate art and the value of classic painting. I understand the historical significance of the Mona Lisa. I also love my fellow man, and I would likely want someone to save me in such a case. I understand the severity of my choice, since either the man or the painting will be lost forever. The fact that my neighbor weighs in favor of the painting’s salvation impacts me. I recognize that in some ways the painting is more valuable to humanity in the long run, and the opinion of my neighbor is important in the immediate. However, my principles also state that life is sacred. Should this principle not trump other considerations? Pastan’s poem seems to indicate that the question almost becomes mute from the point of the view of the older person. She states that as an older woman reconsidering the question she realizes that she and the painting are one and that both are beyond saving “by children.” This implies that such decisions are made easier with experience and time. As a young person, one weighs the many different moral implications (using relativism), or one acts out of stated principles (using absolutism). However, it is likely that the question of whether to save the man or the painting not only changes depending on which ethical framework is used, it also changes depending on where I am in my moral history when I make the decision. For now, I would act against the principle and save the painting. References GATTACA. Andrew Nicol, director. Columbia Pictures, 1997. Pastan, Linda. “Ethics.” [online] Accessed October 17, 2011, from http://mareeblogblogblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/ethics-linda-pastan-in-ethics-class-so.html. Plato. Crito. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. [online] Accessed October 17, 2011, from http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/crito.html. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“GATTACA film Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1437231-gattaca-film
(GATTACA Film Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1437231-gattaca-film.
“GATTACA Film Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1437231-gattaca-film.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Analysis of GATTACA Film by Andrew Nicol and Ethics Poem by Pastan

John Donnes poem The Flea and Andrew Marvells

This paper 'John Donne's poem 'The Flea' and Andrew Marvell's poem 'To his coy mistress'' briefly describes the two historical periods in which these poems occur, and compares the two poems drawing out similarities and differences in content and style.... The two poems show different types of gender relationships from a pure, and probably youthful, power struggle, based on monolithic authorities like the Bible and the monarchy in Donne's poem....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Analysis of the film Gattaca in reference to its discussion about eugenics and getenics engineering

Running Head: GATTACA ANALYSIS analysis of the film Gattaca in reference to its discussion about eugenics and genetic engineering analysis of the film Gattaca in reference to its discussion about eugenics and genetic engineering The film Gattaca (1997) presents a moral dilemma as it explores a world in which genetic selection has created races of people in which some are considered better and put into a higher social class than those who are conceived naturally....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Analysis of Two Poems by John Donne

"analysis of Two Poems by John Donne" paper analyzes two poems "The Legacy" and "The Flea" in which the author depicts a society in different ways.... Arts often represent society by portraying such through the analysis of the artist.... People attach immense importance to sexual relations and so does John Donne in the poem.... The persona in the poem tries to convince a woman to sleep with him and in doing so; the persona explains his belief in relation to sexual intercourse....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Andrew Marvell and Oliver Cromwell

The poem welcomes Cromwell home from his conquest of Ireland, looking forward to his campaign against the Scots.... Since Cromwell returned from Ireland in May 1650, and entered Scotland on July 22 of the same year, the poem therefore, was probably written in the early summer of 1650.... The poem contrasts two political figures, the ceremonial Charles I and the military Cromwell.... In this poem Marvell's attitude towards Cromwell is at best ambivalent....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

There Is No Gene for the Human Spirit

This film from writer/director andrew Niccol is an extraordinary look into eugenics, and genetic engineering in the near future.... .... ... ... The dream of many which started in 1883 by Francis Galton, a British explorer and natural scientist influenced by Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Rhetorical Strategies Used in the Film Gattaca

In the essay 'Rhetorical Strategies Used in the Film Gattaca' the author focuses on the three rhetorical strategies that andrew Niccol used in the film Gattaca: logos, ethos, and pathos.... andrew Niccol knows that is our nature to be sympathetic to the underdogs and the oppressed and being such, this was thoroughly exploited in the film Gattaca for the audience to connect with the main protagonist, the invalid who beat valid Vincent.... The author states that the rhetorical strategy logos was obviously used in the film to draw sympathy for Vincent when society put so much emphasis on predetermining the destiny of an individual just by his or her genetic make-up....
1 Pages (250 words) Movie Review

Stylistic Analysis of Poems

This essay "Stylistic analysis of Poems" discusses different poets that make use of a diverse range of literary devices.... A close analysis of the poem reveals that the free bird represents the white race that enjoyed freedom while the caged bird represented the African Americans that suffered the misfortunes resulting from racial segregation and slavery (Bloom, 2009).... On the interpretation of the poem, this rhyme scheme involving lines was used to enhance the poet's meaning and the narrator's willingness to keep his promise (Subramanian, 2004)....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Analysis of the movie Gattaca

The film directed by Niccol displays a society where that uses the knowledge of eugenics in reproduction.... The film bases its intention between the These derived names represent individuals with certain genome.... This is the basis of genetic discrimination that the film depicts.... he main character in the film is Vincent who is an invalid.... he ethical dilemma and interpretations that surrounds the film Gattaca, however, are numerous....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us