StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Torture is Never Justified - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
From the paper "Torture is Never Justified" it is clear that the ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ has set clear rules that forbid the use of torture. Conversely, some argue that torture is morally justified in certain extreme circumstances, especially when the lives of people are in danger…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.5% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Torture is Never Justified"

Running Head: TORTURE IS NEVER JUSTIFIED Torture is Never Justified Name Course Institution Date Torture is Never Justified Executive Summary This essay has discussed why torture is never justified. It has also examined arguments that support the use torture. Through a review of various relevant literatures, it is established in this essay that, torture is never justified because it is inhumane, unethical, morally wrong and contravenes with human rights. This argument is founded on Immanuel Kant’s ethics theory which stipulates that the morality of an action is essentially based on the adherence of the action to rules or duty. On the other hand, some contemporary commentators argue that torture can be justified in certain extreme circumstances, especially when the lives of many people are in danger. Those in support for the use of torture in extreme cases base their arguments on consequentialism and utilitarian ethics which dictate that an ethical or a morally right action is one that produces good outcomes or positive consequences. Nevertheless, the key argument in this essay is that, torture cannot be justified since it undermines human dignity and contravenes with human rights. Introduction This essay seeks to provide incisive insight on why torture is never justified based on a review of various relevant literatures. In addition to this, it will present counter arguments supporting the use torture. Torture is commonly described as the deliberate infliction of mental or physical pain by individuals acting on the orders of an authority in order to force a suspect to make a confession or yield information. Similarly, the “United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel and Inhuman Treatment” defines torture as suffering or pain either mental or physical that is inflicted on person for purposes such as; obtaining a confession, coercing information, intimidation or punishment for a crime (Carll, 2007). Over the years, there has been much debate and controversy regarding whether or not torture is justified. Some, especially human rights and religious groups argue that, torture is not justified since it is morally wrong and it violated fundamental human rights. Furthermore, based on the International Human Rights Conventions torture is regarded as a crime against humanity. Conversely, others argue that torture is morally justified in certain extreme circumstances (Miller, 2005; Rehman & Breau, 2007). The thesis of this essay accentuates that, torture is never justified because it is inhumane, unethical, morally wrong and contravenes with fundamental human rights. Effects of Torture In his article, “No pain, no gain? Torture and ethics in the war on terror” Bellamy (2006) provides elaborate examples on some of the detrimental effects of torture. He alludes to the cases of terrorist suspects who were victims of inhumane torture despite the fact that no evidence of terrorist activities was established. Bellamy notes that, torture victims undergo critical physical and mental torment that can eventually lead to health complications, mental trauma and even death. In addition to this, he points out the possibility that innocent persons could be victims of inhumane torture (Bellamy, 2006). In most cases, torture involves the use of brutal and inhumane practices such as copal punishment, sexual assault, mutilation, oxygen deprivation, tooth extraction, solitary confinement, intimidation and blackmailing. These practices are generally inhumane and undermine human dignity (Rejali, 2009). Furthermore, Miller (2005) observes that victims who have been subjected to prolonged torture often become psychologically or physically damaged such that after their release, they are unable to function as normal human beings. Bellamy also notes that torture involves the use of violence against persons who are defenseless thus it violates the principles of non-combat immunity (Bellamy, 2006). It is also worth noting that, the use of torture may not necessarily be effective in realising certain goals such as the disclosure of information. In some cases, victims may provide wrong information due to the pressure or pain they are experiencing. Moreover, in some instances suspects may experience emotional and psychological trauma, loose consciousness, loose their memory or even die as a result of brutal treatment. Thus the use of torture can be ineffective and unjustifiable (Rejali, 2009). The Legality of Torture Based on a deontological outlook, Immanuel Kant’s ethics theory stipulates that the morality of an action is essentially based on the adherence of the action to rules or duty. According to this theory, the wrongness or rightness of an action is not dependent on the consequences of the action rather it is dependent on the whether the action fulfills duty or is in line with the set rules (Kant, 2009). According to the International Human Rights Conventions torture is regarded as a crime against humanity. Moreover, the “United Nations Convention Against Torture forbids individuals and nations from using torture. Similarly, in 1949 the Geneva Convention outlawed acts of torture particularly against prisoners of war (Rodley & Pollard, 2009). In democratic countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada among many other countries, the use of torture is outlawed. For instance, in the United States torture is outlawed under the Eighth Amendment. Torture is particularly considered a crime in “Standards of Conduct for Interrogation” under 18 U.S.C section 2340- 2340A. The United States also provides political asylum to victims who have credible fears of torture at the hands of authorities (Greenberg, 2006; Said, 2006). In Australia, the Crimes Legislation Amendment Bill, relating to Torture Prohibition and Death Penalty Abolition was enacted under the Commonwealth Criminal Code. Generally, this bill outlaws the use of torture or any inhumane punishment (Heller & Dubber, 2010). According to these set of laws torture is not justified. Therefore, with reference to Kant’s ethics theory, torture is unlawful and unethical since it is not in accordance to the set rules or laws. The Morality of Torture Torture is not only regarded as unethical and unlawful, it is also morally wrong. There is broad consensus that torture is morally wrong since most of the torture methods used are in humane and barbaric. Sussman (2005) argues that torture is morally wrong mainly because it violates the will of a human being. He observes that the main goal of using torture is to force an individual to collude against himself or his own will. When brutal torture methods are used, the victim often experiences a sense of powerlessness and is forced to be complicit in their own violation. Sussman notes that, torture also violates the victim’s autonomy and agency. It also perverts the victims and makes them yield and become retrogressive (Sussman, 2005). Torture and Human Rights Torture is also not justifiable because it violates fundamental human rights. The ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights,’ provides some of the fundamental rights that each individual is entitled to regardless of their status. For instance Article 5 stipulates that; “No person should be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” Similarly, Article 9 provides that, “No person should be subjected to arbitrary arrest, exile or detention.” In addition to this, Article 10 of the ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights, provides that, “each individual is entitled to fair public hearing by an impartial and independent tribunal, in the determination of his obligations and rights or any criminal charge leveled against them .” Evidently, the use of torture especially in the form of copal punishment, sexual assault, mutilation, oxygen deprivation, solitary confinement and detention without trial contravenes with the fundamental human rights provided under the ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ (Puybaret, 2008). Based on the findings of the literatures reviewed in the above section, it is thus evident that torture is not justified mainly because it is inhumane, unethical, morally wrong and contravenes with human rights (Bellamy, 2006). Counter Argument Although most people agree that inhumane and barbaric torture can never be justified. Some argue that the use of torture is justifiable or morally mandatory in certain extreme circumstances. Those who support the use of torture often allude to consequentialism and utilitarian ethics. Generally, consequentialism ethics dictates that an ethical or a morally right action is one that produces good outcomes or positive consequences. On the other hand, utilitarian ethics dictate that an ethical or a morally right action is one that maximizes on the overall happiness of many rather than that of an individual. In essence, these ethical perspectives hold that, an action should be judged directly based on its consequences for happiness (Graham, 2010). Philosopher Michael Levin justifies and supports the use of torture based on a utilitarian outlook. He gives an example of a scenario where the lives of many people will be lost unless a suspected terrorist in custody provides information regarding the location of a bomb. Levin notes that, the suspect may refuse to talk or provide information on the location of the bomb. Therefore, in such, a case the use of torture is justifiable so as to coerce the suspect to disclose the required information that would save the lives of the innocent people. The use of torture in this case would maximizes on the overall happiness of many or result to a positive consequence that would benefit many (Levinson, 2002). Similarly, Levinson (2002) and Miller (2005) argue that torture is morally justified in certain extreme circumstances, especially when the lives of people are in danger. Conclusion A critical review of literature shows that, there is much debate and controversy regarding whether or not torture is justified. Basically, this essay has discussed why torture is never justified. Based on the findings of the various literatures reviewed, it is apparent that torture is not justified mainly because it is inhumane, unethical, morally wrong and contravenes with human rights (Bellamy, 2006; Sussman, 2005; Rejali, 2009). With reference to Kantian ethical outlook torture is not justifiable or ethical since it is not in accordance to the set rules or laws. The ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ has set clear rules that forbid the use of torture. Conversely, some argue that torture is morally justified in certain extreme circumstances, especially when the lives of people are in danger (Levinson, 2002; Miller, 2005). However, based on the findings of this essay, it is apparent that, torture is never justified mainly because it undermines human dignity, can lead to the loss of innocent lives, it contravenes with human rights and it violates the victim’s will and autonomy (Bellamy, 2006; Sussman, 2005; Rejali, 2009). References Bellamy, J.A. (2006). “No pain, no gain? Torture and ethics in the war on terror.” International Affairs 82(1), 121-148. Carll, E. K. (2007). Trauma Psychology: Issues in Violence, Disaster, Health and Illness. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing. Graham, G. (2010). Theories of ethics: An introduction to moral philosophy with a selection of classic readings. New York: Taylor & Francis. Greenberg, K. J. (2006). The Torture Debate in America. Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press. Heller, K. & Dubber, M. (2010). The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Kant, I. (2009). Theory of Ethics. Memphis: General Books. Levinson, D. (2002). Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment. London: SAGE. Miller, S. (2005). Is Torture Ever Morally Justifiable? International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2), 179-192. Puybaret, E. (2008). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Geneva: UN Publication. Rejali, D. (2009). Torture and Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Rehman, J. & Breau, S. (2007). Religion, Human Rights and International Law: A Critical Examination of Islamic State Practices. Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. Rodley, N. & Pollard, M. (2009). The Treatment of Prisoners under International Law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Said, W. E. (2006). ‘Political Asylum and Torture: a comparative analysis’. Third World Quarterly 27(5), 871-883. Sussman, D. (2005). What’s Wrong with Torture? Philosophy and Public Affairs 33(1), 1-33. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Torture Is Never Justified ( Argumentative Essay ) Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
Torture Is Never Justified ( Argumentative Essay ) Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. https://studentshare.org/law/2047840-torture-is-never-justified-argumentative-essay
(Torture Is Never Justified ( Argumentative Essay ) Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Torture Is Never Justified ( Argumentative Essay ) Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/2047840-torture-is-never-justified-argumentative-essay.
“Torture Is Never Justified ( Argumentative Essay ) Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”. https://studentshare.org/law/2047840-torture-is-never-justified-argumentative-essay.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Torture is Never Justified

Article 2 v Article 3 In a Ticking Bomb Scenario

The paper tells that the idea behind the ticking bomb scenario is to brain storm on the methods of torture adopted inflicted upon suspects by the law enforcing agencies of the country to extract information irrespective of the matter whether such acts have valid justification and legality.... Every one of us knows that torture in any form or shape is prohibited under local law / international law in most of the countries around the globe.... Besides United Nations Convention against torture, ratified by the representatives of 147 countries does not allow torture on captive suspects....
36 Pages (9000 words) Dissertation

Is Torture ever acceptable

Each man must be able to live by personal freedom, however, torture is used on people that sway away from the regulations of a moral society and create bottlenecks in the peace structure of living.... ?? torture is the act of inflicting pain and trauma upon someone else in order to achieve a personal gain, and subsequently, as the quote suggests, people who have faced torture in their lives, try and take out their frustration by inflicting torture upon other people....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Torture in Extreme Emergencies

The various debates regarding this issue include whether torture is justifiable during emergencies and also whether it is considered legal in states where there are ongoing terrorist attacks.... However, the extent of it and consent of the person being tortured to brand the assault as torture is well arguable.... Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment (United Nations 1984 - see Other Internet Resources), a distinction is made between torture and inhumane treatment, albeit torture is a species of inhumane treatment....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Horrible Impact of Nazi Concentration Camps

In the case of Amery's torture, they feel justified in their act mainly because they have apprehended a person who has political leanings that are totally out of sync with theirs.... The underlying essence of the account given by Jean Amery forces the reader to look closely at the reasons behind the torture program that went on in all concentration camps.... The author makes a valiant effort to look at a torture victim through the eyes of a person who is perpetrating the torture....
5 Pages (1250 words) Term Paper

Torture as a Legitimate Counter-Terror Strategy and Its Implications

The essay "torture as a Legitimate Counter-Terror Strategy and Its Implications" focuses on the critical analysis of the major issues on torture as a legitimate counter-terror strategy and its implications.... Most if not all states are increasingly resorting to the use of torture and other ill-treatment as their counter-terrorism strategy while disregarding the legal institutional safeguards designed to prevent torture.... Similarly, other states have undermined the global commitment to the avoidance of torture and handed over terror suspects to the countries where they are highly susceptible to torture as well as other human rights abuses....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

Why Torture is Justifiable

This essay "Why torture is Justifiable" explains why torture is roughly universally deployed.... Regardless of this, it is commonly applied contrary to the common belief that torture is not safe.... Another type of torture is wall-standing which consists of forcing the victim to upright and balanced against a cell wall in the "search position" for some time at a time stirring up agonizing muscle cramps.... It also includes subjection to noise where a victim of torture is placed in close nearness to the repetitive, such as a generator or compressor as a whine of machinery for as long as six or seven days (Lukes, 35)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Torture of Suspected Terrorists

The author of the paper titled "The Torture of Suspected Terrorists" discusses whether torture of suspected terrorists is justified or not in the context of anti-terrorism laws framed in western countries after the September 11, 2001 terror attacks.... Torture has been justified by some scholars on the ground that the victim is, in any case, an aggressor and it is better to kill or torture one to save thousands.... According to the 'ticking bomb hypothesis', even liberals have justified the use of torture to get information out of suspected terrorists or to threaten other potential terrorists....
11 Pages (2750 words) Case Study

The Ethical Question of the Use of Torture

The paper "The Ethical Question of the Use of Torture" describes that torture is, on one hand, universally determined to be ethically unacceptable.... o date, the most often justification for torture is that it indeed works in the extraction of information or confession from terror suspects; and that torture is required in circumstances when the greater good is in danger (as a result of the concealment of 'that' information).... What is obvious from the preceding discussion is that the debate on the moral (and social) acceptability of torture as a legitimate tool specifically for intelligence gathering is far from being over....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us