StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
In the article ‘The place of nonhumans in environmental issues’, Peter Singer opines that humans do not treat nonhuman beings equally though they evidently have the right to be treated equally. According to the scholar, nonhuman beings too have interests and rights, and…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.3% of users find it useful
Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer"

Aditya Santoso Philosophy – Ethics – Sara Rettus 2/6 ‘The Place of Nonhumans in Environmental Issues” In the article ‘The place of nonhumans in environmental issues’, Peter Singer opines that humans do not treat nonhuman beings equally though they evidently have the right to be treated equally. According to the scholar, nonhuman beings too have interests and rights, and hence, they too have the right to get equality in moral consideration. He says that when a ‘reservoir’ is constructed, though people express concern that it would drown a valley teeming with wildlife, the reason behind this concern often lies in the fact that the valley has value as a place for recreation like hunting, shooting, and bush walking.

In order to prove the hollowness of this ‘speciesism’, Singer provides the example of the history of slavery. The White slave owners never took the sufferings of the Black slaves into consideration because their moral concerns were limited to White people (135). Thus, according to him, if ‘racism’ is not moral, ‘speciesism’ too is immoral. Secondly, Singer opines that animals have interests because they have feelings like pain (135). Also, Singer points out animals have equal rights despite their lack of communication skills and intelligence because lunatics and infants too enjoy equal rights.

The scholar says that equality in quality is not a necessary factor for giving moral value to nonhuman things. He claims that even within the human species, there is wide disparity in qualities like intelligence, physical strength, ability to communicate, and so on.However, the problem with Singer’s opinion is that in his effort to protect animal rights, he forgot the fact that humans too are animals with the right to protect their own interests like all other animals do. It is for Singer to show a cow or a goat that tries to preserve some grass for another species before filling its own stomach.

The mistake with Singer’s opinion is that he failed to acknowledge the fact that all advanced species take maximum advantage of the circumstances to promote their own welfare. Singer admits the fact that there are pests in nature. Then he has to admit that humans are just another group of pests that takes advantage of the suitable circumstances to grow. This is the law of nature. Another vulnerability of his opinion is that he has mixed morality with nature. The mere fact is that morality is just a social construct which is purely aimed at human welfare.

Moreover, the concept of morality, as he admits, is not concrete. It varies from time to time, and population to population. According to the science of evolution, humans have been eating meat since the very beginning of human evolution, and studies have not shown that human intestine is not suitable for meat. Works CitedSinger, Peter. “The Place of Non Humans in Environmental Issues”. Chapter six Animals, vegetarianism, and Environmental Ethics.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1589050-philosophy-animal-rights-by-peter-singer
(Philosophy - Animal Rights by Peter Singer Essay)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1589050-philosophy-animal-rights-by-peter-singer.
“Philosophy - Animal Rights by Peter Singer Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1589050-philosophy-animal-rights-by-peter-singer.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer

Kants Categorical Imperative and Singers Views on the Eating Animals

According to peter singer, we should not sacrifice major interest to satisfy minor interest.... According to singer, we must not act so as to sacrifice a major interest for a minor interest.... Explain how this affects singer's views on the eating animals and use of them in experiments and his views on abortion and euthanasia.... The philosophy of peter Singler is very interesting and unique.... Name Subject Date philosophy 1....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Singers Practical Ethics

nbsp;peter singer in his book “Practical Ethics” writes, “The utilitarian will judge bad in some circumstances and good in others, depending on its consequences”.... peter singer's concept of utilitarianism ensures the individual right and freedom to come to own conclusions, and he advises all not to be follow-the-leader type individuals....     peter singer is the strong supporter of animal rights.... peter singer is a compulsive controversy creator....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

The Rights of the Non-human Animals

It is true that all breathing animals have morale rights like human beings.... Therefore, it can be stated that non-human animals also have the basic rights similar to the human beings.... The non-human animals have the fundamental rights to live like the human beings.... In terms of fundamental rights of non-human animals and moral ethics, it can be stated that killing or torturing of animals should be stopped as it can hamper the ecological balance....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Recreational Hunting: An immoral Violation of Animal Rights

As is evident, therefore, both camps have diametrically opposed perceptions of the ethics of recreational hunting, with the controversy essentially coming down to the anthropocentrism doctrine versus that of animal rights.... While one may concede to the fact that the proponents of recreational hunting have raised a number of valid points in defence of their stance, the fact rema ins that recreational hunting is little other than a cruel blood sport which is ultimately predicated on the erroneous assumption of man's dominion over nature, on the one hand, and the fact that animals do not have rights, on the other....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Ethical Treatment of Animals and Animal Rights

animal rights is the idea that all animals are entitled to certain rights because they also possess moral rights, as a result of which those rights should be recognized within the framework of the law.... The idea that “all animals are equal” refers to the principle of equal consideration of interests, as put forth by singer: “The interests of every affected by an action are to be taken into account and given the same weight as the like interests of any other being....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Meat Eating - a Necessary Evil

animal rights activists are not necessarily against meat eating but cruelty towards animals.... rdquo; People have gone ahead to write about this issue one being Jay Bost who wrote an award winning article by the name “Give Thanks for Meat” and other writers like singer, Peter and Mason who wrote the book “The Ethics of what we eat: why our food choices matter”.... The main variation between the two is Bost sees meat eating as a not so bad activity while singer and the other writers have a firm stand on the unethically of meat eating....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Response to Kant and Singer

This discussion talks that in their respective articles, peter singer and Immanuel Kant address specific issues that explain the behavior of humans especially the relationship that exists between humans and other non-human animals.... hellip; According to the report, peter singer looks into the contentious issues of animal liberation while Immanuel Kant adopts a passive approach as he strives to explain moral worth invalidating numerous behaviors and actions....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Singer's Distinction between Self-Consciousness and Sentience

For example, peter singer observes that over time, there have been dramatic changes with regards to people's attitudes on morality.... Singer's distinction between sentience and self-consciousnessWith regards to the philosophy of animal rights sentience is a term commonly used to describe the ability to experience or feel pain and pleasure.... A good number of animal rights advocates argue that any being which is sentient has the right not to be subjected to suffering....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us