StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Southern Secession Commissioners and Causes of Civil War - Book Report/Review Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay "Southern Secession Commissioners and Causes of Civil War" cites Charles Dew that the united states illegally used force to free the slaves in the Southern States. Dew affirms previous historians claim the Civil War cropped up because of the slave issue…
Download free paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.1% of users find it useful
Southern Secession Commissioners and Causes of Civil War
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Southern Secession Commissioners and Causes of Civil War"

Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War, Charles Dew Part I The author, Charles Dew, emphasized that the Union states illegally used force to impose its decision to free the slaves on the Southern States (Dew 1). The Southern states had sent commissioners to the other states to convince them to secede (separate) from the rest of the United States because the Republicans under United States President Abraham Lincoln did not agree with the Southern States’ decision to exercise the States’ right to keep the slaves as personal property of the Southern slave owners. Dew affirms the previous historians’ account that the Civil War cropped up because of the slave issue. The Union solders wanted the Confederate states to free the African American Slaves. On the other hand, the Southern States’ apostles of disunion (Southern Secession Commissioners) convinced the other Southern states to secede from the Union states as a matter of states’ right and to prevent the Republican (Union) states from meddling in the internal affairs of the Southern States. The Southern States’ 1860 to 1861 Apostles of Disunion came from Alabama, Lousiana, South Carolina, Mississippi, and Georgia. Further, the author does not agree with the previous historians treated the topic of the slave issue of the civil war (Dew 1). The previous historians created an impression that the Southern states have to right to keep the slaves as person properties. The previous historians created an impression that the Union States are completely right in forcing the Southern States to free their personal property, the slave. This image runs counter to the constitution’s democratic principle of ownership of property and the right of the state to exercise its political, economic, social and other rights and power over its citizens and residents. Furthermore, the author shows that some authors create an impression that the Southern states have a right to create and maintain their own destination (Dew 1). The same authors emphasize that the Southern States have the constitutional duty to prevent other states from preventing its political decision to maintain its own internal policies, including classifying the slaves as not equal to the White slave owners. The authors create an impression that the Southern States refuses marriages between African Americans and the superior White Race. The author offers a vivid answer to the issue of Slavery (Dew 1). Likewise, the author clearly answers the question that the Southern States have the right to secede in order to prevent the Republican states from meddling in the internal political, social, economic and other policies of the Southern States. The author insists that the Southern States have the states’ right to be free from the meddling affairs of the Republican (Union) states’ preference to the slaves within the Republican (Union) states (Dew 1). If the Southern (Confederate) States won the war, the current society of the Southern would be different. The current African Americans will continue to be slaves. As a person growing up in one of the Southern States, Dew’s personal opinion on the issue is biased in favor of his Southern States’ preference. Part II: The author includes documents to support his thesis and other statements (Dew 1). Dew includes the speeches and other documents contributed by institutions like Williams College, Library of Congress, Library of Virginia, Museum of the Confederacy, state historical society of Wisconsin, Mississippi Historical Society and University of Carolina. The author also uses the contributed materials from scholars to bolster his thesis and other emphasized issues. The scholars include Jon Wakelyn, John Hubbell, Jessie Hutcheson, and Ken Stampp. Further, the author uses the Douglas Southall Freeman’s Lee’s Lieutenants voluminous records to back up his concepts (Dew 1). Dew also scrutinized the official records of the Union and Confederate Armies to back up his issues. Dew states that the Southern states severed their ties with the Republicans on December 20, 1860. In response, the Republicans attacked the South to prevent the Secession and force the Southern States to free the slaves. Furthermore, the author interprets the evidence as bible truth. Dew insists that the evidences prove that the Southern States have a right to chart their own destiny, without the unwarranted interference of the Republican (Union) states’ minding the Southern States’ internal businesses. The primary evidences and secondary resources that include Michael Holt’s research, J Mill’s Thornton research, Peton Mccrary Article, Clark Miller article, and Dale Baum’s article prove that Dew’s slave issues are convincingly correct (Dew 1). Dew included the speeches of the Southern political leaders during 1860 to 1861 to back up his contentions that the coming Civil War was caused by the slave issue. Dew mentioned affirmed war records that the Civil War formally started with the battle of Fort Sumter Charleston, South Carolina when Confederate soldiers attacked the Union Soldiers’ fort on April 12, 1861. The author uses the speeches of the political leaders of the Southern states as evidence to support his book’s issues (Dew 1). The author uses the primary evidences offered by scholars and institutions to prove his several points. One of the evidencs is Stephens’ 1871 Cornerstone Speech stating the secession was the only way to prevent the Union states’ forced freeing of the Southern States’ slaves. The author treats the acquired evidences as bible truth (Dew 2). This is understandable. As a person growing up in one of the Southern States, Dew writes in a bias manner, favoring the Southern States’ preference to keep the slaves and prevent the African Americans from being equal to the White man in society. Dew goes forward to explain why current Day Southern States still insist of their right to keep the slaves by honoring the long dead Confederate soldiers, commanders, and other Confederate symbols. Dew affirms the many historians offer different interpretations of the past (Dew 1). Some interpretations affirm the same issues. Other historians present conflicting events or issues. Dew uses primary speeches and other documents created by the Southern States’ political leaders to back up his book’s contentions. The interpretations affirm the book’s overall arguments that the South had the right to secede or keep its slaves, and that the Republicans, Northerners, have no right to interfere with the internal affairs of the Southern States. Part III: The author, Dew, should be well completed for this literary masterpiece. He used lots of time, energy, and money to gather the evidences to prove his concepts. Dew spent lots of time, money, and energy searching for primary sources. Dew also spent time searching for secondary sources to prove his points. The book contains very convincing evidences that will sway the doubting readers to side with the author. In fact, the book will even persuade current day readers to take the time machine and travel back to fight on the side of the Confederate army. The book has several strengths. Dew presents primary evidences to prove his point. Likewise, Dew presents secondary references to prove his pro-slavery and pro-secession concepts. The book opens the eyes of the current generation. The book has its weaknesses. Dew does not offer enough evidences to prove that the Slaves have the right to freedom. Dew does not offer additional evidences to prove that the Republicans were forced into the war. In concluding, the book has some flaws. First, Dew’s book is filled to the brim with plenty of sources to prove his contentions. However, Dew should include more evidences that favor the Union’s side of the story, including the right of the slaves to be free. The book lacks evidences. The author should include more evidences including more primary resources and speeches of the Union (Republican) political leaders. The Dew book is very compelling. The book will surely strike most readers as an original work of historic art that originally looks at the slave issue from a different point of view, the view of the Southern States’s right to chart their own political destiny. Clearly, the book’s thesis convinces me to side with Dew’s thesis. The author’s inclusion of historical evidences, especially dates of historic value, vividly supports the author’s points of view. Surely, the author excellently used the acquired sources to present a very original and convincing concept that the Southern States should not be bothered, in terms of running their internal affairs. Dew is right in interpreting the evidences. The war proves that the Southern States’ people were willing to die for their causes, secession, right to keep slaves, right to keep the African Americans as unequal to the White person, and right not to be interfered by the Republican (Union) states. Dew’s book is very clear, direct to the point, and easily understood by the readers. Lastly, the entire book is very strong in many points. The book is weak in terms of gathering evidences that counter the author’s points of view. Works Cited Dew, Charles. Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War. Virginia: University of Virginia Press, 2002. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes Book Report/Review, n.d.)
Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes Book Report/Review. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/literature/1817734-apostles-of-disunion-southern-secession-commissioners-and-the-causes-of-the-civil-war-charles-dew
(Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes Book Report/Review)
Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes Book Report/Review. https://studentshare.org/literature/1817734-apostles-of-disunion-southern-secession-commissioners-and-the-causes-of-the-civil-war-charles-dew.
“Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes Book Report/Review”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/literature/1817734-apostles-of-disunion-southern-secession-commissioners-and-the-causes-of-the-civil-war-charles-dew.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Southern Secession Commissioners and Causes of Civil War

American and Great Civil War

Name Instructor Task Date American and Great civil war Introduction The major cause of American civil war was from a fundamental discrepancy between two sectors, North and South, concerning the position of slavery in the Union.... If secession were partial to eleven states subsequently, the upper states could gather together four million war men to the union 1, 100, 000.... South passed order of secession, took federal installations, and identified out their armed force (Chikering & Forster)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

The U.S. Civil War was more about State rights than the liberation of slaves

civil war was more about State rights than the liberation of slaves Introduction The American civil war, which started from 1861 and ended in 1865, can be regarded as the bloodiest conflict to be witnessed1 in the history of the United States.... Based on this, therefore, the paper will provide concrete arguments as to why the American civil war is considered as war for State rights.... The secession of the states in the South marked the beginning of the civil war and this happened at a time when Lincoln assumed the office of the president....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

HISTORY - choose 1 of the questions to answer

The law, planned by Whig Senator Henry Clay of Kentucky and brokered by Democrat Stephen Douglas and Clay, shunned away from secession or civil war and eased sectional disagreement for four years in the United States.... The Compromise resolved a four-year disagreement between the free states of the North and the slave states of the South concerning the status of boundaries obtained during the American-Mexican war (1846–1848).... Mid September of 1850, the United States Congress, took a number of measures to resolve the issues concerning slavery and forestall secession....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

American Civil War Description

The paper presents the history of the American civil war which lasted four years and cost the nation an estimated 633,000 lives.... Even if the civil war had not touched slavery, the conflict still would have transformed America.... The war helped mold the modern American nation-state and encouraged industrialization.... "All Americans experienced the crucible of war; but the war affected no group more than the four million African Americans who saw its beginning as slaves and emerged as free people" (Roark, et al; page 370)....
10 Pages (2500 words) Term Paper

Causes Won, Lost, and Forgotten by Gary Gallagher

In Causes Won, Lost, and Forgotten: How Hollywood and Popular Art Shape What We Know about the civil war (henceforth, Causes), Gary Gallagher presents a riveting analysis of the impact of film and art on the historical imagination of the civil war, through an exploration of more.... Using his expertise as a civil war researcher and personal experiences, Gallagher weaves the context of the interpretive framework that influences popular In Causes, we find how visual representation may – knowingly or unknowingly – color our understanding of past events, and discover the many ways this has occurred in the specific history of the civil war in the United States (US)....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Causes and Excuses for the United States Civil War

here is a great deal of disagreement upon the root causes of this war, but it boils down to one simple point, according to Basler , “The ultimate cause of the civil war was simply human disagreement, which could not be, or rather was not, resolved by non‐ violent means.... Lincolns War, the War Against Slavery, the War for Abolition, the Southern Rebellion, the War of the Rebellion, the War for Southern Rights, the War of the Southern Planters, the civil war, Americas civil war, the War Between the States, the civil war Between the States, the War Against...
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

Civil war and reconstruction

Apostles of Disunion: southern secession commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War.... In the North, there were efforts to limit the spread of slavery by abolishing it, while in the South, people wanted to maintain and expand the institution, hence making slavery a focal point of political crisis, in fact, during 1800-1860, the Southern economy History and Political Science civil war and Reconstruction There was a significant crisis faced by United s, whereby the Northern and Southern states had become less social, economical and political....
2 Pages (500 words) Term Paper

Origins of America's Civil War

There is a debate between those who think it represents white supremacy and those who think it represents a rich Southern history, and this book The paper 'Origins of America's civil war" is an outstanding example of an annotated bibliography on history.... The Political Origins of the civil war.... This article is about the political reasons behind the American civil war.... Slavery, the Constitution, and the Origins of the civil war....
3 Pages (750 words) Annotated Bibliography
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us