StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Legal Estate and Equitable Interests in the Property - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay "The Legal Estate and Equitable Interests in the Property" explores concurrent estate. Persons who jointly own the property are either termed as co-tenants or co-owners. There are different ways by which more than one person can own property…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.2% of users find it useful
The Legal Estate and Equitable Interests in the Property
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Legal Estate and Equitable Interests in the Property"

? Land Law Number: Land Law Outline the devolution of the legal e and equitable interests in the property (70 marks) Property that is owned by two or more individuals, jointly and at the same time is referred to as concurrent estate. In retrospect, persons who jointly own the property are either termed as co- tenants or co-owners. There are different ways by which more than one person can own property. These include: joint tenancy, joint tenants in common, community property and tenancy in the entirety. Different types of ownership stipulate different rights and liabilities of co-tenants. The type of ownership determines guidelines on the property in terms of attempts to sell it, and methods by which the property can be transferred. In this case, each owner is referred to as a tenant in common. The freehold property that the four pioneer owners (Allan, Ben, Chris and David) bought by contributing different amounts makes them tenants in common (TIC). Unless otherwise stated, most courts assume that a tenancy in common exists whenever several persons take concurrent possession of a single piece of land. When land is granted, transferred, conveyed, assigned or bequeathed to two or more persons, other than as executors, administrators or trustees in either fee simple or any lesser estate, legal or equitable, and the tenancy is not specified in the document creating the estate, the co-owners hold as tenants in common1. Each member has an interest in a particular part of the parcel and the right to access the parcel as a whole. Each co-owner is allowed to choose who will inherit his or her ownership interest upon death. In cases where no will exists, then the share of the deceased would go to the persons entitled under the rules of intestacy. Each co-owner is liable to the others if they cause any deterioration in the value of the property. Tenancy in common only has the unity of possession and has no right of survivorship. Unity of possession is achieved when each co-owner is entitled to possession of the whole property. In situations where the conveyance in favor of the co-owners includes how the co-owners should hold the equitable interest in the property, this agreement is conclusive2. Each tenant in common enjoys autonomy in dealing with his interest, including the decision to dispose of the interest by will. Each tenant in common holds undivided proportionate interests. Tenants in common cannot hold unity of interest because their interests are not proportionate. Each tenant is awarded interest according to his contribution. Initially, the shares of Allan, Ben, Chris and David are determined by how much each owner contributed to the purchase of the property. After Chris retired and sold his shares to Fiona, Fiona owned Chris’ shares and hers as well. The sale of Chris’ shares to Fiona does not alter the arrangement between the remaining owners. However, a transfer must be used and fees should be charged on the value of the proportionate interest being transferred. On the other hand, Elsa took over David’s shares after David died. After Elsa died, Gerry and Harry became co-owners, each entitled to the share Elsa assigned him. It is permissible for Harry and Garry to hold Elsa’s interest in joint custody. In that case, Harry and Garry can be joint tenants so that they are both tenants in common with the other co-tenants. As joint tenants, they enjoy the right of survivorship which presumes that when one dies, the other takes over ownership of the entire parcel which they shared before the death. This minimizes delays when handing over property. Incase Garry, having inherited property does not desire to claim any ownership interest, the interest to the property can be transferred to the other tenants in common. As joint tenants, Harry and Garry have four unities which include: interest, time, title and possession. Joint tenancy mandates owners to have the same interest, developed under the same conveyance, starting at the same time and held under the same undivided possession3. Unity of time mandates the co-owners to acquire the property at the same time. Unity of title mandates the co-owners to have the same title to the property. Unity of interest mandates each co-owner to own an equal share of the property. For example, it requires Garry and Harry to each own half of the shares left by Elsa. Unity of possession mandates the co-owners to have equal right in possession of the parcel. A unilateral declaration made by either the co-owners does not shake any of the unities, hence, it does not severe the joint tenancy.4 When Harry died and left no will, his shares would be left to Garry. When two co-owners sever joint tenancy, they both become tenants in common. Severance of joint ownership can happen either by notice which must be given in writing; or by act of one tenant operating on the basis of his own share5. Explain whether Ben is free to sell the property as he chooses (20 mks) Working with other persons in some cases leads to property disputes and conflicts. In cases where the conflicts fail to be resolved, it is advisable to file a civil suit in court to find a solution. Ben is entitled to choose to dissolve the concurrent ownership following disagreements arising among tenants. Disagreements on how the property should be used and maintained justify Ben’s decision to dissolve the tenancy in common. Also, any individual may buy the property and convert it to his own use. Fiona, whom Ben suspects may oppose his decision to dissolve the business, may buy the property and convert it to her own use. However, Ben is not free to sell the property as he chooses. When the members decide to dissolve the business, a court order to partition the property follows. This allows each of the concurrent members to choose how to deal with property. If the parties can agree on how to divide the property, the tenants can avoid going to court to facilitate partitioning of the property. However, if disagreements persist, Ben or any other co-owner should file a law suit requesting relief. Filing a partition action is made in the court to request it to divide the property among the tenants in common. The court requires all owners of the property to be present at the hearing of the partition. Failure of an owner to appear at a court hearing translates to the owner losing his right to contest any rulings by the judge in the future. Before the hearing, it is important to have the value of the property ascertained and notes made in case the court proceedings will make the property depreciate. What steps should be taken to effect a sale? A tenancy in common can be terminated by the sale of the entire property either to a single -owner in common or to or to several co-owners. Any co-owner that made improvements to the property receives compensation from the other co-owners. Alternatively, any member that caused any devaluation in the property bears the liability of any deterioration in value. To effect a sale, a partition is to be filed. There are three ways through which tenants can make a partition. First, they can make a voluntary agreement that does not involve the courts. Secondly, co-owners can make a petition in kind. This requires a petition to partition and divides each member’s share. Thirdly, petition by forced sale involves selling the property and dividing the proceeds from the sale according to each member’s share. The last two methods involve going to court and securing a court order to sell the property, and distribute the proceeds amongst owners. Most TICs require judicial foreclosure. Partition by sale is advantageous because selling the whole piece of land means that more value of the land is retained. In this case, if Ben cannot reach an amicable agreement with Fiona, he must file a suit in court. He may obtain a partition of the property. This divides the land into particular owned parts. In case this partition is not allowed, a forced sale of the property ensues which is followed by distribution of the proceeds. If the suit succeeds, the property is sold and the proceeds are distributed equitably among the members. Since members own separate and distinct shares from the company, the proceeds from the sales are divided equitably according to the interest rates of each member. References Burgess v Rawnsley, ER 142 (1975) Ettrick(Lord) v Hunter, AC 713 (1993) Gafford v Graham, 3 EGLR 75 (1999) Goodman v Gallant, Fam 106 (1986). Greenfield v Greenfield, 38P and CR 570 (1979) Harris v Goddard, 1 WLR 1203 (1983) Henry Campel Black, 4th rev. ed. Blacks’ Law Dictionary, American Bar Association (1968) Hillingdon v ARC Limited, ch. 139 (1998) Jaggard v Sawyer, 1 WLR 269 (1995) Johns & Hem 546 (1861) Law of Property Act, R.S.A 2000 c.L-76, Albert Queens Printer (2000) Nielson-Jones v Fedden , 222 (1975) Schofield v. Graham, 69 W.W.R 332 (1969) Tinsey v Milligan, 2 FLR 963 (1993) Williams and Hensman, 70 E.R 862 at 867 (1861) Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Land law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1397599-land-law
(Land Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1397599-land-law.
“Land Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1397599-land-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Legal Estate and Equitable Interests in the Property

Principles of Equity

However, the courts may give a greater degree of attention to the plight of Ella and grant her an equitable interest in the property allowing her to prevent the repossession of the house under proprietary estoppel.... his would effectively mean that Ella would not have a legal interest in the property.... It states above that the property was only registered in one name and therefore it would only require one signature for the sale or mortgage of the property1....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Legal Estate Ownership under English Law

The registration of the property under the names of all the three parties gives rise to a joint tenancy of both the legal and equitable estates.... Eventually, Albert sold off Sunrise Lodge and used the proceeds to make a full purchase of another freehold property, Greengables of which the legal title was placed into the joint names of Albert, Barbara, and Charles.... The position at this stage was that both the equitable and the legal estates were held jointly by Albert, Barbara, and Charles for he had attained the age of majority....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Law of Property

ith regard to the unity of title requirement, this stipulates that the parties' proprietary interests in the property must derive from the same legal title and at the same time.... Moreover, the general trust law principles, impose a positive obligation, on trustees, to act in the best interests of the trust, and, therefore, Deborah will have to apply to the court, for a sale of the property, which, will only be granted, if determined to be in the best interests, of the trust....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

Principle of Equitable Interest in Land

Where a wife has limited contributions to the property and there is no promise of the husband to transfer the property to the wife, there is no equitable basis for the claim.... Lord Wilberforce stated that 'before a right or an interest can be admitted into the category of property, or of a right affecting the property, it must be definable, identifiable by third parties, capable in its nature of assumption by third parties, and have some degree of permanence or stability'....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Joint Tenants and the Tenants in Common

As per the legal area of ‘Tenancy In Common', these two members are now entitled for the complete ownership of their share in the property and use it as per their will and convenience, such as deciding whether to sale the share or gift it to their heir3.... Notably, as Alan, Bettina, Daniel, Edward and Claude were initially into joint tenancy for their purchased house, it can clearly be assumed that they had an equal proportion of share for the property.... It is worth oning in this context that the rule of joint tenancy is guided by the provision of ‘the right of survivorship', which reflects that following the death of any of the joint owners, the other share holder(s) of the property shall withhold their ownership right with respect to the entire property as per section 33 of the Administration of Estates Act 1925....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

The Land Registration Laws

According to unregistered title to land before 1925, the In addition, equitable interests bound persons other than bona fide purchases of the estate for value without any notice of equitable rights3.... According to Kevin gray, ‘immunity from pre-existing equitable rights guaranteed only in the case of the purchaser of a legal estate whose conscience was wholly unaffected, such as purchaser was sometimes known simply as Equity's Darling1.... In this case, equitable rights were not enforceable against a bona fide purchaser of a legal estate for value without any notice of any other attached claim to the estate....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Discussing the Case Concerning Property Law in England

However, where the property has been found the finder has a duty to try to identify the true owner of the property before they would be entitled to claim ownership of the item.... The paper "Discussing the Case Concerning Property Law in England" highlights that the statement that equitable interests are not property rights is therefore not strictly correct as case law has demonstrated how the courts have given rights to persons whose interest has existed purely in equity....
14 Pages (3500 words) Coursework

The Law of Property

It will also be necessary to consider legal interests in the property.... It will also be necessary to consider legal interests in the property as well as any equitable interests that might exist.... This assignment "The Law of Property" deals with explaining the nature of the legal and equitable interests that may exist in the house, how Liam might realize the purchase value of any interest he might have and any ways in which Jonathan might assert rights in the property....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us