StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Good Strategy vs Bad Strategy: the Difference and Why it Matters - Book Report/Review Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper 'Good Strategy vs Bad Strategy: the Difference and Why it Matters' states that the strategies framed by the organizations have become a common process in the business. There are some organizations that develop strategies specific to the business while other organizations undertake strategies that are applied across the industry…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.4% of users find it useful
Good Strategy vs Bad Strategy: the Difference and Why it Matters
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Good Strategy vs Bad Strategy: the Difference and Why it Matters"

The strategies that are prepared with the imaginative thought processes and anticipating the changes that could be implemented rather than hands-on experiments and testing to forecast results might prove to e a failed strategy. The difference between the good strategies and the bad strategies lies in the area of focus and the approach of the organization to finalize ways for meeting the challenges in the business operations. The good strategies on the other hand envisage a diverse way of meeting the challenges that are set apart from the industry trends.

The organization-specific strategies have been relatively successful as compared to the generalized approach or strategies to achieve organizational goals. Good strategies are those that are unique in nature and are adopted by the companies as exceptions to the industry-wide practices. Although several companies have been widely practicing similar strategies that have resulted in all-inclusive failures like the global financial crisis, the companies which have been able to stand out of the industry-wide strategic norms have been able to achieve comparatively more success with the help of their unique strategies.

The strategies framed by the companies could be linked to corporate profitability as the innovative designs and approaches adopted in their business have helped them to overcome the challenges and stand out of the population as the ultimate survivor towards sustainability of the business. Central pillars The major learning outcomes that could be achieved from the concepts of the good strategies and the bad strategies, the underlying differences, and their importance have been explained as follows.

The first learning outcome states that there is an inherent difference in understanding the language of strategy by the organizations. There are several organizations that link strategy with the ideal state of affairs in the business. The practical scenario is, however, different where the companies are required to consider the actual hurdles in the path of progress of the business. The consideration of the actual hurdles in the business operations would help the companies to identify the process gaps and then implement the necessary changes to fill those gaps.

A strategy that does not take the practical hurdles, anticipated changes in the business over a specific timeline could prove to be a failed strategy. The understanding of the factors that are responsible for framing good strategies and bad strategies is extremely important as it determines the success rate of business and corporate profitability (Rumelt 48). The second learning outcome states the pragmatic approach of the organization is setting its organizational vision, mission, objectives, and goals that trigger the strategic policies of the organization.

There have been several organizations that do not set realistic goals in their business due to the fact that their mission and vision statements are overstated. In order to undertake a good strategy, the organizations should be able to set realistic goals considering the challenges in the various business processes. The strategies should be specific to the organization and not follow the industry-wide practice in order to emerge successful in a time of crisis. The third learning outcome in the distinction between good strategies and bad strategies is that the strategy should be innovative in nature and should be designed with steps that are specifically required to fulfill the organizational objectives and goals. 

The strategies should form a cohesive approach involving the various sub-functions of the organization. The coordinated action of the various sub-functions of the organization should explore the various alternatives and the opportunities like leverage, dynamics of the human resources, supply chain management, focus on customer relationships, etc. Effective strategy making is possible through an integration of the argument and the action. The arguments on the foreseeable success due to some preplanned approach could be implemented with a series of planned actions. This is only possible with the help of framing good strategies by the organization. The logic behind strategy formation is to overcome the challenges and achieve the ultimate goal through a sequence of coordinated actions.

The book which explains the subtle differences and the characteristics of the good strategies and the bad strategies, their importance in the business and the industry will certainly impact future managers. The future managers would take into consideration the examples of the past and the explanation presented by the author on the characteristics of good strategies and the reasons why strategies tend to fail. This will lead the future managers to consider the industry-wide practices and then design unique strategies for the organization that are diverse from the strategies adopted in the industry. The uniqueness in the strategies adopted by the future managers would fulfill the first criteria of not aligning to similarity but resorting to the diversified approach of strategy formation. In order to build effective strategies in the future, the managers would consider the practical obstacles in the business processes and the potential of the organization to achieve realistic goals. Instead of moving towards an ideal and over-ambitious approach, the managers would tend to set realistic goals. The belief on the dynamics of the workforce, the leverage potential of the business, the supply chain management, the customer relationships would be taken into consideration for strategy preparation. By using the learning outcomes, the managers would tend to assess the obstacles that could be faced in the realization of the business goals over a specified timeline and then design a coordinated approach for attaining the goals and objectives of the organization.

 

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Good Strategy/Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why it Matters Richard Book Report/Review”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/business/1488798-good-strategy-bad-strategy-the-difference-and-why
(Good Strategy/Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters Richard Book Report/Review)
https://studentshare.org/business/1488798-good-strategy-bad-strategy-the-difference-and-why.
“Good Strategy/Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters Richard Book Report/Review”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/business/1488798-good-strategy-bad-strategy-the-difference-and-why.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Good Strategy vs Bad Strategy: the Difference and Why it Matters

Eco Bus Cultural Differences and Marketing Strategy

The purpose of the paper 'Cultural difference and marketing strategy' is to analyze Taiwan companies, which can be termed as 'benevolent dictatorship companies'.... Since, there is a key decision maker here, so the employees don't have much say in the matters.... armonious environment but they expect to be given directions by the senior team member, but when working with a Taiwanese team one has try to avoid incidents that may cast a member in bad light in front of other members of the group....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Good Strategy/Bad Strategy: the difference and why it matters by Richard Rumelt

he first part of the book named “Good Strategy/Bad Strategy: the difference and why it matters” by Richard Rumelt states that creating objectives, budgets, key priorities, leadership and visions is not equal to creating strategies.... Moreover the author states that there can be both good and bad strategy depending on the skill, ability, leadership, thinking process and many such factors related to the strategy maker.... Further he did not get too much involved in the “messianic visions of the future” (Rumelt 13) “Kernel” for creating good strategy According to the writer, strategy can prove to be good when they include “kernel”....
4 Pages (1000 words) Book Report/Review

Good Strategy/Bad Strategy

Instructor Date Good Strategy/bad strategy Thesis The work compiled by Rumelt- Good Strategy/bad strategy involves the best methodology and plan for steering the best companies.... Central pillars – Define and discuss three major learning outcomes Three major learning outcomes from the work include; To describe the Kernel of Good Strategy To identifying why discovering power is good strategy To identify when a bad strategy has been implemented The Kernel of Good Strategy Rumelt argues that all good strategies- kernel- must embrace diagnosis, guiding course of action, and logical actions (Chapter 1)....
3 Pages (750 words) Book Report/Review

Book review on Good Strategy/Bad Strategy

Strategy is not something that one can consider as his list of wishes but it is the way through which one can utilize his energy and his resources to attain his The concept of good strategy unfolds the idea that strategy can be implemented outside the world of business and organizations.... A good strategy not only motivates a person to move forward but it also helps the person to attain his goals by overcoming the hurdles and the challenges.... He believes the fact that a good strategy has three pillars: a guiding policy, diagnosis and a firm action....
4 Pages (1000 words) Book Report/Review

The Concept of Good and Bad Strategy

The paper "The Concept of Good and bad strategy" discusses that it is for undoubted reasons that the concept of a good and bad strategy as argued by Rumelt is built upon the relevance of strategic implementation in most organizations across the world.... pparently, a good strategy has been described as one concept that is modest and easy to understand.... Of importance to note is that a good strategy is comprised of numerous analyses, and strong development of thoughts and implemented policies that reduce obstacles for the sole purpose of ensuring that the organization moves ahead in terms of maximizing its profit....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment

Good Strategy and Bad Strategy - Rumelt

The paper "Good Strategy and bad strategy - Rumelt" states that in a prescriptive model-based strategy, the most appropriate decision is not based on ranks or importance, but on the unique situation and characteristic of a problem faced by the management or organization.... The objective of the current research is to understand and critically analyze the concepts of good and bad strategy as described by Rumelt.... ccording to Rumelt, a bad strategy is not necessarily the reverse of a good strategy....
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

Functional Strategy of Pertaining to PepsiCo

The paper "Functional strategy of Pertaining to PepsiCo" discusses that PepsiCo is trying their hard to be able to face the new changes in the environment and the world in general.... PepsiCo can use SWOT analysis to fabricate a strategy and find out the obstacle which is needed to be eliminated immediately to access the most important advantage.... For instance, after a SWOT analysis, it is found that the need for a marketing strategy has arisen to market the nutritious foods and beverages in order to have greater benefit....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Good Strategy vs Bad Strategy

The author of this assignment "good strategy vs bad strategy" touches upon the concept of the strategic management.... Failure to consider these obstacles in management leads to the implementation of the bad strategy.... A good strategy, in this case, should involve identification and analysis of obstacles a company of a business entity is facing at the time of lying strategies (Harney, 2011).... According to Rumelt (2012), this approach lacks the sense of realism because a strategy cannot be evaluated based on a list of outcomes....
12 Pages (3000 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us